What has been done here was experimenting. And the movie is a reformulation, a new deal, which faces the whole Batman concept in a whole new way. It was the biggest box office hit of 1995, made more than Tim Burton’s Batman Returns, and set the series up for a fast turnaround leading to 1997’s Batman & Robin.Is actually an incredible powerhouse remake of the camp 50's series: Robin's circus clothes, the Riddler's green, etc. It’s how I’ll be remembered,” he said.īut as is often forgotten, Batman Forever was seen, at the time of its release, as the resurgence of the Batman series. “Yes, I was like ‘are you kidding me?’ I think that will be on my gravestone. In 2014, Schumacher talked to Varietyand admits he remains surprised that the nipples remain so controversial. He did add that “I can’t understand why nipples on a man would be such a shocking thing,” and production designer Barbara Ling noted that “the idea was to get an anatomical kind of look.”
The full piece certainly doesn’t read as though Schumacher is dictating to Kane how Batman should be. That quote needs a little context, as there’s a light-hearted feel to the interview. It’s my Gotham City, and if I want Batman to have nipples, he’s going to have nipples!” Watch Batman Forever on Amazon Schumacher added that “I wanted a very sexy, very sensual, very body-hugging suit. I told him ‘it’s the 90s, Bob! Pumped up!'” In the same article, he said that “Bob Kane doesn’t understand why Chris O’Donnell has an earring and Batman has nipples. So whose decision was it? Director Joel Schumacher’s ultimately.
0 kommentar(er)
